Photo of a CT Scan MachinePhoto of a CT Scan Machine
Reports

Public quality measure report: Thorax CT—use of contrast material in 2015

February 4, 2020
Amino Data Team

A public report on national and state hospital outpatient service quality as measured using Qualified Entity Medicare data and commercial claims data from 2015.

Background

A computed tomography scan, usually referred to as a CT scan, is a computer-controlled X-ray procedure that gives physicians a detailed view of the internal structures and tissues of the body. The procedure is commonly used to diagnose diseases and evaluate traumatic injuries. A thoracic CT scan focuses on the patient’s chest (or thorax) and is used to provide images of the heart, lungs, and upper abdominal area.

Certain CT scans require the use of a contrast dye, which is typically delivered orally or intravenously, to highlight certain areas or tissues and provide additional clarity and detail in the image. CT scans are generally ordered and performed “with contrast” or “without contrast” depending on the clinical situation.

Sometimes a CT scan is performed both without contrast and then with contrast, known as a “combined” or “with and without contrast” scan. Such combined CT scans are the subject of this report.

About the measure

The quality measure used in this report, Thorax CT—Use of Contrast Material, calculates the percentage of chest CT scans that are performed as combined (with and without contrast) scans out of all chest CT scans over a one year period.

The measure aims to identify and reduce overuse of combined chest CT scans. Combined CT scans (with and without contrast) expose patients to double the X-ray radiation of a single scan. While sometimes clinically necessary, combination CT scans generally increase patient risk with little benefit.

This measure has been publicly reported by the measure steward, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) as a component of its Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (HOQR) Program. This metric is endorsed by the National Quality Forum (NQF) with metric number 0513.

Data and methodology

This report is generated using Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) claims data and Amino’s commercial insurance claims for calendar year 2015. Following the measure guidelines, this report summarizes the rates of combined chest CT scans out of all chest CT scans at the national level and for each state.

The metric is evaluated with the following numerator and denominator eligibility and exclusion rules:

Numerator Eligibility

Of claims in the denominator, the number of thorax CT studies with and without contrast (combined studies).

Denominator Eligibility

The total number of thorax CT studies performed with contrast, without contrast, or both with and without contrast (combined studies).

Exclusions

Any claims with diagnosis codes associated with:

  • Crushing injury
  • Internal injury of chest, abdomen, and pelvis
  • Non-traumatic aortic disease

Professional component (PC) claims (i.e. 26 modifiers) are not included in the calculation to avoid double counting.

Results

National results

The results for the measure computed on nationwide data from each data source in 2015 are as follows:

Percentage of combined chest CT scans out of all chest CT scans, nationwide (lower is better)

Data source National result
Amino’s commercial insurance claims    2.9%
Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) 1.8%
Commercial + Medicare FFS 2.2%


These results are calculated as the percentage of chest CT scans performed as combined studies (with and without contrast) out of all chest CT scans (without contrast, with contrast, and combined) that did not fall within the exclusion criteria.

State-level results

The results for the measure computed on data for each state in 2015  are as follows, again broken out by data source:

These results are calculated as the percentage of chest CT scans performed as combined studies (with and without contrast) out of all chest CT scans (without contrast, with contrast, and combined) that did not fall within the exclusion criteria.

Additional information

Amino has created and published this report as part of our participation in the CMS Qualified Entity (QE) Program. For more information about Amino, the QE program, and the measure used in this report, refer to the following:

Subscribe to Building Blocks

People-centered perspectives, delivered to your inbox every other week.
We use your email address to send you relevant content. You can unsubscribe from our mailing list any time. For more details, check out our Privacy Policy.

Related content

future of health plan design - amino health
Articles

Three predictions for the future of health plan design

Price transparency, rising healthcare costs, and the member experience all factor in to the health plan design of the future.

Read Article
healthcare front desk staff with patient - amino health
Articles

The problem—and opportunity—with machine-readable files

Machine-readable files are just now being published and bringing with them a massive shift for the healthcare industry.

Read Article
amino refer announcement
Articles

Amino Health expands product portfolio with Amino Refer to streamline care team referrals

Added functionality for providers, clinic teams, and care coordinators provides validated, high-value referrals to support a member’s care journey

Read Article